电影小妇人观后感200字精练

小妇人读后感1
《小妇人》这本书主要写了马奇家四姐妹的美好生活和痛苦。
大姐是梅格，二姐是乔，三姐是贝思，小妹是艾米。她们四姐妹长得都很好。梅格十分标致。乔身材修长。贝思有着一双明亮的眼睛。艾米总是一副淑女的派头。家里有和蔼可亲的妈妈马奇夫人和大家的好朋友佣人罕娜婆婆。爸爸在华盛顿当兵，有一次突然病倒了，全家人都很着急，妈妈去了华盛顿四姐妹被好心的邻居劳伦斯先生和他的孙子劳里照顾着。爸爸得救了回到了家里！最后梅格嫁给了一直照顾爸爸的布鲁克先生，乔嫁给了巴尔教授，艾米嫁给了好朋友邻居劳里，三姐妹都有了好的归宿，可是贝思不幸的离开了人世！
这本书非常有意思，我推荐大家有时间的话找来看看。
小妇人读后感2
这本书里我最喜爱的人物是家里的小妹妹艾米。别看她是家中最小的一个，她可是个淑女哦！她擅长勾织，法文也读得很好，不过她最出色的还是绘画了。虽然她小的时候有点虚荣和自私，不过在家人的耐心教导下，她很快就认识到了自己的缺点，并通过自身不懈的努力下，改掉了这些缺点，并对自己的人生观有了新的并且更加美好的认识。
《小妇人》用朴实无华的写实手法描写了马奇家的四姐妹，在她们艺术家一般的才能下，强调的是个人的尊严和自立自律的重要，体现了奋发有为的美国精神。
怎么样？听了我的介绍，你是不是也想看一看呢？那就赶快到我们的小书吧看一看吧！我会把这本书捐献给班级哦！
小妇人读后感3
美国女作家路易莎？梅？奥尔科特的《小妇人》让我认识了一个家庭中的四位坚强的.女孩：梅格、乔、贝思、艾米。梅格窈窕贤淑；乔泼辣直爽，贝恩温柔文静，艾米漂这活泼。
她们性格不同，各有追求。追求高贵但会照顾人的大姐梅格，充满躁动却关心家人的二姐乔梦想成为作家，优雅自私却颇得人爱的艾米喜欢绘，以及忘我无私却需要家里人的贝思爱好弹钢琴。
她们都对美好生活充满渴望。她们从天真走向成熟，从脆弱走向坚忍，从急切走向耐心，从自我走向他人，每一个人，都是坚强的。
小妇人读后感4
“天下兴亡匹夫有责”，不错，正如故炎武所说，这就是责任的体现。在养育关系中，会产生父母和子女的责任；在教学关系中，会产生教师和学生的责任。责任是对一个人做与不做某些事的要求，它是人类社会的财富。

父母给了我们血肉之躯，党和人民把我们养育，全面发展是我们的义务，刻苦学习是我们的天职，宏扬中华传统美德，立志成为现代人才，竭尽全力报效社会，决不辜负祖国母亲是我们应尽的责任，也是我们体现自己价值的财富，仅管需要负出很的的代价。
责任是一盏航标灯，有了它，生命之旅便不会迷途；责任是一副担子，挑起它，我们才会拥有充实而有价值的人生。
责任是真正的财富！
小妇人读后感5
这本书写的是马奇太太家中的四位女儿是如何从少女成长为妇女的生活片断，描写了人物丰富的内心世界。
这本书让我感受到了四姐妹不同的性格与爱好，其中着墨最多的是“乔”，她生性活泼，不但对大家细心照顾，而且有着对生活不懈追求的韧性，从而体现出她那多愁善感的内心思想与活泼好动的表面表现的极大反差。
其中，我最喜欢的人物是贝思，因为她对生活十分热爱、平易近人，在病危之季仍坚持写作，表现了她不懈努力地追求美好生活。
小妇人读后感6
这本小说以家庭生活为描写对象，以家庭成员的感情纠葛为线索，描写了马奇一家的天伦之爱。马奇家的四姐妹中，无论是为了爱情甘于贫困的梅格，还是通过自己奋斗成为作家的乔，以及坦然面对死亡的贝思和以扶弱为己任的艾米。
虽然她们的理想和命运都不尽相同，但是她们都具有自强自立的共同特点。小说描写了她们对家庭的眷恋；对爱的忠诚以及对亲情的渴望；描写了她们历经风雨的磨难和奋斗的过程。她们写作、绘画、弹琴、创作剧本、演出、管理家务……
这些无一不渗透着她们的多才多艺。同时，她们又结社办报，照顾婶婶、做家庭教师……明智、自由地选择了自己的生活道路，她们的归宿虽然各不相同，但都是自强自立精神的结果。
Little Amy stealths the show. Absolutely. Words of wisdom just slips out of her mouth so effortlessly yet so inspiring. And considering of her age, she gives a new meaning to what little woman is all about. I like the way little Amy fly about the scene with her fancy theatric moves, it’s hard not to give your attention when she is around. To be fair, she is a little bit overactive for her part, but I don’t blame her.

As for her grown-up, I find the scene where she turnes down Jo’s offer of affection and bashs his jeasousy quite amusing. In fact, this is the soul of the play where everyone’s fate hangs on it. Whether it’s covincing or not can make or break the play. it’s a great pleasure to hear smart people defending and arguing for their feelings, so that they end up realizing they are not smart at all.
So funny, I can play the scene time and time again in my head.
I don’t like Jo in this play. They’ve got the wrong girl to say the least. Even her beautifual black eyes and masculine eyebrow is of no help to her. The trick is you can’t call that bad acting, just that she doesn’t fit well with Jo. She sets about striking you as daring, unworldly, not bound by rules and lacking in feminiety. But she is just a tomboy.
They are bunch of them nowadays and what the fuss all about her?. Jo should be someone unusual, one of a kind, out of this world. In a sense, I wouldn’t mind to call Jo an American incarnation of Joan of Arc. I have seen better. Now I have to confess her predecessor(Kathrine Herpen) is really of something.

The encounter between this Jo and her German professor is like staged romance. A silly school girl stumbling into a knowlegeable scholar who happens to be not married. Why does she get so tighten up in his room and what is that seduction scene in the theatre for. it’s all so cliché, second-hand romance or acting copyed from other people’s genius plays, exactly like what Teddy says.
And the way she throw herself to her lover and being so ready to give her heart is the last straw for me. A reformed woman, you’ll say.
If you want to know what good acting is about, just look at Meg, or the mother, though I think it’s too easy a case for Susan. Teddy’s role is delivered very well. He ‘s natural, and there’s no ambiguous thing about his feelings, so well done. Granted The problem with Jo and Teddy is in their characters, because they are of the same impulsive kind.
They look at each other, and they see their own weakness, and the excitement challenging your own kind is quite childish, is’t? But the timing of self-awareness coming to you is also very important. Teddy finds his peace of mind in Amy, and Jo in professor. But I still think there’s no certainty about fate and character, not in real life, Teddy and Jo could have made the second best match.

Nothing is perfect in the world, so why couldn’t they be part of it?